UGREEN NAS vs Synology in 2026
As an Amazon Associate this site earns from qualifying purchases. We may earn a commission when you buy through our links, at no extra cost to you.
Our Pick
UGREEN DXP4800 Plus
UGREEN wins for built-in 10GbE, memory headroom, and Intel graphics. Synology wins when mature backup workflows, administration, and support matter more.
| Specification | Our pick: UGREEN DXP4800 Plus (opens in a new tab) Our Pick | Synology DS925+ (opens in a new tab) Software Pick |
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Intel Pentium Gold 8505, 5C/6T | AMD Ryzen V1500B, 4C/8T |
| Memory | 8GB DDR5, up to 64GB | 4GB ECC, up to 32GB |
| Networking | 10GbE plus 2.5GbE | 2x 2.5GbE |
| NVMe | 2x M.2 | 2x M.2 |
| Software | UGOS Pro | DSM |
| Best fit | Docker and fast networking | Managed storage and backup |
| Links | Check price for UGREEN DXP4800 Plus (opens in a new tab) | Check price for Synology DS925+ (opens in a new tab) |
Our picks in detail
UGREEN DXP4800 Plus
- CPU
- Intel Pentium Gold 8505 (5 cores, 6 threads, up to 4.4 GHz)
- Memory
- 8GB DDR5, expandable to 64GB
- Network
- 1x 10GbE plus 1x 2.5GbE
- Storage
- 4 SATA bays plus 2 M.2 slots
A strong hardware package with built-in 10GbE, Intel graphics, and room for 64GB of memory. The owner accepts a younger operating-system ecosystem.
Pros
Cons
Synology DS925+
- CPU
- AMD Ryzen V1500B, 4C/8T, 2.2 GHz
- Memory
- 4GB ECC, up to 32GB
- Network
- 2x 2.5GbE (no PCIe slot)
- Storage
- 4 SATA bays plus 2 M.2 slots
The safer software and support choice. It gives up 10GbE and integrated graphics in exchange for DSM and ECC memory.
Pros
Cons
The UGREEN DXP4800 Plus and Synology DS925+ represent the hardware-first and software-first approaches to a four-bay NAS.
UGREEN gives the owner built-in 10GbE, integrated graphics, and DDR5 memory that expands to 64GB. Synology provides ECC memory and the more mature operating, backup, and support environment.
Quick verdict
Choose UGREEN for fast networking, Docker, media processing, and hardware value. Choose Synology for simpler administration, mature backup tools, and a system that people who do not want to become NAS specialists can administer.
CPU and applications
The DXP4800 Plus uses an Intel Pentium Gold 8505 with one performance core and four efficiency cores (six threads), rated up to 4.4 GHz, with integrated graphics. The DS925+‘s Ryzen V1500B has four cores and eight threads at 2.2 GHz but no integrated graphics.
The Intel chip’s higher peak clock favors lightly threaded tasks, while the V1500B’s extra threads help with many parallel jobs. For hardware transcoding or mixed media use, the Intel platform is the safer fit; for direct-play media, either unit can serve files.
Winner: UGREEN, mainly for the integrated graphics.
Memory
The UGREEN ships with 8GB of DDR5 and expands to 64GB, twice the Synology’s ceiling. The Synology starts with 4GB but uses ECC and expands to 32GB across two slots. Synology recommends its own memory modules and says it will not provide complete warranty or technical support if you expand with third-party modules, so factor Synology RAM into the upgrade cost.
Choose capacity for dense container workloads; choose ECC when storage integrity and appliance behavior are the priority.
Winner: Depends on the workload.
Networking
This is the clearest difference. The DXP4800 Plus includes one 10GbE port and one 2.5GbE port. The DS925+ has dual 2.5GbE and no PCIe slot, so it cannot take Synology’s E10G22-T1-Mini 10GbE module.
If a workstation, virtualization host, or editing workflow needs more than 2.5GbE to the NAS, UGREEN wins without qualification. The 10GbE port pays off only if your switch and the client on the other end also run at 10GbE.
Winner: UGREEN.
Software, drives, and ownership
DSM is the reason to choose Synology. Its storage management, accounts, alerts, backup packages, snapshots, remote administration, and accumulated support documentation reduce operational uncertainty. Since DSM 7.3 (October 2025), Synology’s 2025 Plus, Value and J models, such as the DS925+ and DS225+, accept third-party 3.5-inch HDDs and 2.5-inch SATA SSDs, but M.2 storage pools and cache still need drives on Synology’s compatibility list.
UGOS Pro covers core NAS and Docker functions but has a shorter history. Owners should be more deliberate about configuration exports, independent backups, update timing, and recovery tests.
Winner: Synology.
Bottom line
The DXP4800 Plus is the stronger compact server and the better 10GbE value. The DS925+ is the stronger storage appliance. For the other current four-bay options, see our best 4-bay NAS roundup.
Whichever model you choose, do not treat RAID as backup. Keep a separate versioned copy and perform a real restore test before trusting the system with irreplaceable data.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which NAS has better hardware?
Which NAS has better software?
Can the DS925+ add 10GbE?
Is UGREEN appropriate for important backups?
Related Articles
Sources
Product specifications and lifecycle details were checked against these primary sources. Prices and availability can change after the access date.
- UGREEN NASync DXP4800 Plus (opens in a new tab), accessed September 30, 2026
- Intel Pentium Gold 8505 specifications (opens in a new tab), accessed September 30, 2026
- Synology DS925+ product specifications (opens in a new tab), accessed September 29, 2026
- Synology DSM 7.3 release announcement (drive compatibility) (opens in a new tab), accessed September 29, 2026
- Synology product support status (opens in a new tab), accessed September 30, 2026